Data Platforms
Data Platforms Solutions
Client OutcomeHow Paragon Micro Delivers
The Situation
The Outcome
Components: Salesforce | Data Architecture & Mapping | Data Integration Strategy | Data Governance Framework | Workflow Analysis | Application Dependency Mapping
Customer Success Highlight
How We Help Build the Right Solution for You
Powered by Trusted Technology Leaders
FAQsPlatform Strategy & Architecture Selection
Start with the workloads, not the vendor. Review query patterns, data volume, latency needs, governance requirements, team skills, and cost model. Then choose the architecture your business can operate, scale, and govern long term.
A lakehouse pattern makes sense when the business needs broader data types, lower storage friction, advanced analytics, machine learning, and AI readiness. A warehouse should stay where structured reporting, governance, and performance are already working well.
Map current standards to the new platform across access, metadata, quality, retention, naming, reporting, and controls. Keep what still works, improve what creates friction, and retire standards that no longer support the operating model.
FAQsData Engineering & Pipeline Design
Define shared engineering standards first, then let each domain shape pipelines around its source systems, users, refresh needs, and data products. The goal is consistent operations without forcing every team into the same design.
Create reusable patterns for ingestion, transformation, testing, monitoring, and deployment. Without standards, each new pipeline adds complexity, cost, and support risk.
Yes, when teams need faster ownership, clearer accountability, and better reuse of trusted data. Domain-oriented data products work best when supported by shared platform standards, governance, and quality controls.
FAQsData Integration & Source Connectivity
Trace source systems, owners, data refresh schedules, downstream reports, security rules, business logic, and failure points. Dependencies should be documented and tested before the source is connected to production workflows.
Use staged integration, parallel runs, validation windows, and rollback planning. Critical sources should be tested against production expectations before users depend on the new data flow.
Pause the rollout, isolate the source issue, compare source and target logic, and correct mappings, transformations, or timing gaps. Validation failures should trigger a controlled fix process, not manual workarounds.
FAQsData Quality, Observability & Lineage
It should be a strategy. Reporting shows what went wrong. A real data quality program defines ownership, rules, monitoring, issue resolution, and prevention so trusted data becomes part of daily operations.
Use common checks, shared metrics, centralized observability, and clear ownership across all pipelines. Teams should see quality issues early, understand business impact, and know who is responsible for fixing them.
Lineage is realistic when it focuses on critical data, regulated workflows, executive reporting, and AI inputs first. Trying to map everything at once creates noise. Start where trust and risk matter most.
FAQsCost Management & Performance
Assign every recommendation to an owner, a workload, a budget, and a decision path. Cost optimization works when it becomes part of platform operations, not a report reviewed once a quarter.
Use workload history, peak demand, concurrency, growth forecasts, and performance targets. Compute should align with proven usage and business priorities, not oversized assumptions.
Show spend by team, workload, platform, and outcome. When teams understand what they consume and what it costs, platform behavior becomes easier to manage.
FAQsSecurity, Access & Governance
Start with baseline roles, data classification, approval paths, and monitoring. Then phase policy enforcement by risk level, so access improves without breaking critical workflows.
Map each framework to a shared control library. One strong control should support multiple requirements, reducing duplicate work and making audit evidence easier to manage.
Review roles, permissions, data movement, service accounts, and policy exceptions on a set schedule. Access governance should evolve with the platform, not trail behind it.